Food Revolution Day

I have been following Food Day and Food Revolution Day activities for a while now. I even posted about Food Day here on the blog before. It is nice to see good initiatives like those brought to light with hard work. Some days ago, I got this kind newsletter email.

Dear Ravi,

Food Day–the nationwide celebration and grassroots campaign for healthy, affordable, and sustainable food is October 24.

But there’s no reason to wait six months to get involved in the food movement!  We on the Food Day team have teamed up with celebrity chef Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution on another important day of action, Food Revolution Day. Jamie has been an important ally helping improve school foods in the U.S., and we’re thrilled to work together this year to keep cooking skills alive.

The second annual Food Revolution Day, a global day of action for people to make a stand for good food and essential cooking skills, is coming up on May 17 and there are loads of ways to get involved!

Food Revolution Day aims to raise awareness about the importance of good food and better food education for everyone. It’s a chance for people to come together within their homes, schools, workplaces and communities to cook and share their kitchen skillsfood knowledge and resources.

Activities are taking place all around the world, from healthy pizza demos and interactive workshops to real food picnics and even a disco salad!

Getting involved can be as simple as making a home-cooked dinner for family and friends, teaching someone how to cook or sharing a favorite recipe. Check out this activity pack, filled with ideas for Food Revolution Day, plus some great ideas to make your event that extra bit special!

Whatever you decide to do, no matter how big or small, be sure to add your activity to the global map atwww.foodrevolutionday.com and join the conversation online with @foodrev using the hash tag #FRD2013.

Join us, the Food Revolution Day team and thousands of others across the world in standing up for better food education and help keep cooking skills alive on May 17.

Sincerely,

Lilia Smelkova, Food Day Campaign Manager”

 

Captura de Tela 2013-05-02 às 11.42.21

Get to know more on Food Day and Food Revolution Day.

 

 

Monsanto doesn’t want you to know what you’re eating

Cornheap

The biotech industry is working to prevent mandatory labeling for foods with genetically engineered contents

BY  AND 

The biotech industry, led by Monsanto, will soon descend on the state of Washington to try its best to defeat I-522, a citizens’ ballot initiative to require mandatory labeling of foods that contain genetically engineered (GE) ingredients. Voters should prepare themselves for an onslaught of discredited talking points, nonsensical red herrings, and outright lies designed to convince voters that they shouldn’t have the right to know what’s in the food they eat.

Topping the biotech industry’s propaganda playlist will no doubt be this old familiar tune: that requiring retailers to verify non-GMO ingredients in order to label them will be burdensome and costly, and the additional cost will be passed on to consumers who are already struggling to feed their families.

Playing to consumers’ fears of higher food costs makes good strategic sense, especially in tough economic times. But the argument doesn’t hold water, say food manufacturers and retailers who already have systems in place for verifying non-GMO, as well as rBGH-free, trans fat-free, country of origin and fair trade. The system involves using chain-of-custody, legally binding affidavits, not expensive testing.

“We have used the affidavit system repeatedly, without undue burden or cost,” said Trudy Bialic, director of public affairs for Seattle-based PCC Natural Markets. PCC, the largest consumer-owned natural food retail co-operative in the United States, uses the affidavit system to ensure its chocolate isn’t made using child slave labor, its dairy products don’t come from animals subjected to rBGH hormones, and that all seafood was harvested using sustainable sources and practices.

Trader Joe’s, a privately held chain of nearly 400 U.S. stores, confirmed that the company’s private label products, under the names Trader Joe’s, Jose’s and Ming’s, are GMO-free, though the company doesn’t label them as such. In an email, a company spokesperson said:

When developing products containing ingredients likely to come from genetically modified sources, we have the supplier of the product in question perform the necessary research to provide documentation that the suspect ingredients are from non-GMO sources.This documentation is in the form of affidavits, identity-preserved certification of seed stock, and third-party lab results from testing of the ingredients in question.

Trader Joe’s performs random audits of items with suspect ingredients, using an outside, third-party lab to perform the testing, the company said. Trader Joe’s system is not unlike that of the USDA, which requires sworn statements from food producers to certify organic foods. The agency requires test samples from approximately 5 percent of products, all of which must be GMO-free in order to be certified organic. For the other 95 percent, the agency relies solely on sworn statements.

Clif Bar & Co. also requires affidavits from ingredient suppliers demonstrating they can meet the company’s stringent non-GMO requirements.

Monsanto would have you believe that verifying and labeling for non-GMO ingredients is a costly and burdensome affair, but the fact that Trader Joe’s, known for its discount prices, can provide GMO-free private label products, which reportedly accounts for over two-thirds of the company’s estimated annual $9 billion in sales, takes the wind out of the “burdensome” argument. That leaves the cost of adding another line of ink to a label. Trader Joe’s doesn’t yet label its private label products as GMO-free, but the company cites a lack of clear labeling guidelines from U.S. governmental agencies as the reason it doesn’t label, not cost.

Megan Westgate, executive director of the Non-GMO Project, confirmed what retailers who use the affidavit system said:  “An affidavit system like what’s proposed in I-522 is a powerful way to have a significant impact on the food supply with minimal cost.”

How does the affidavit system work?

Companies selling non-GMO foods provide a sworn statement (i.e., an affidavit) to the retailer that the ingredients used are sourced from crops that aren’t intentionally genetically engineered. The affidavit, unless deliberately dishonest, protects the manufacturer and the retailer from liability in the case of unintentional GMO contamination.

Retailers are responsible only for labeling a few raw commodities that may contain GE ingredients, such as sweet corn, papaya or squash.  In these cases, the retailer can either stick a simple label on the bin or ask its supplier for an affidavit stating that the crop is GMO free.

Under this system, no costly testing for GE ingredients is required. No burdensome government oversight is necessary. The system is inherently designed to protect small grocers and retailers, at no additional cost to the customer or taxpayer.

The beauty of the affidavit system is that it offers retailers and manufacturers a simple, easy way to comply with a regulatory model that provides consumers with the right to know what’s in their food without increasing grocery costs.  Even for manufacturers who might otherwise seek to pass on the trivial expense of relabeling to consumers, empirical studies show that the fear of losing customers in the competitive food industry will be a deterrent to raising prices. Did food costs change when we labeled calorie content?

Is the system reliable? Retailers say yes. Why would manufacturers intentionally deceive retailers only to open themselves up to a lawsuit and public relations nightmare? And the system has a proven track record. PCC Natural Markets, Trader Joe’s and Clif Bar all use affidavits, as do other manufacturers who use them for country-of-origin and no-trans fat labeling. And nearly two-thirds of the nation’s largest dairy processors use sworn affidavits from producers in order to label rBGH-free. (rBGH, or recombinant bovine growth hormone, is a synthetic, genetically engineered hormone injected into dairy cows to increase milk production.)

Contrary to claims made by companies like Monsanto, states do have a constitutional right to label food. In fact, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act explicitly allows states to add language to labels so long as the federal government doesn’t require language on the same subject – a right that has consistently held up in federal court.

A chain-of-custody, legally binding affidavit labeling system empowers consumers to make more informed choices about what we eat, without increasing the costs of groceries or burdening retailers and manufacturers.  One simple label to identify foods that have been genetically engineered, often using the genes of foreign bacteria and viruses, would lead more consumers to seek out sustainable, organic, non-GMO alternatives. And that – not some phony line about increased food costs – is why Monsanto is fighting labeling.

Feedipedia: An on-line encyclopedia of animal feeds

sl_barley

Feedipedia is an open access information system on animal feed resources that provides information on nature, occurrence, chemical composition, nutritional value and safe use of nearly 1400 worldwide livestock feeds. It is managed jointly by INRACIRADAFZand FAO.

The main objective of Feedipedia is to provide extension and development workers, planners, project formulators, livestock farmers, science managers, policy makers, students and researchers with the latest scientific information to help them identify, characterize and properly use feed resources to sustainably develop the livestock sector.

This is particularly important in emerging and developing countries where feed resources available locally are often under-utilized due to lack of information. Providing global knowledge on feed resources, including unconventional and lesser known ones, contributes to the development and use of innovative and appropriate feeding options and strategies.

sl_bananas

sl_alfalfa_protein_concentrate

 

Feeds datasheets contain the following information:

  • Feed names, including vernacular and scientific names
  • Description of the plants or plant parts/products used as feed
  • Feeding recommendations for the main livestock species: cattle, sheep, goats, camels, poultry, pigs, rabbits, horses, fish and crustaceans
  • Tables of composition and nutritive value
  • Illustrations, including photos and processing charts
  • Distribution and basic agronomic information
  • Forage management
  • Processes for improving nutritional value
  • Potential constraints such as presence of anti-nutritional and toxic factors
  • Environmental impact of the production and use of feeds

sl_sorghum sl_pea

How to create a food revolution

food01Jamie Oliver, the Better Food Foundation’s founder is a chef, author, television personality, and food activist. His TV series include The Naked Chef (BBC), Jamie’s Ministry of Food, and the Emmy Award–winning Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution (ABC).

It’s 2013, and we live in a world where the majority of us have a broken relationship with food. There are around two billion undernourished people but also more than one billion who are dangerously overweight or obese, and that number is going up.

If you’re reading this in the United States or the United Kingdom, then congratulations: you live in one of the unhealthiest nations in the world.

The question is no longer how we got here, because any intelligent person with one eye on the media will know the answers. The question now is, “What can we do about it?” I don’t pretend to have all the answers, but the people power of last year’s Food Revolution Day is an example of what can be achieved by harnessing the passion and dedication of a small but growing handful of food ambassadors globally—more on this later.

Meanwhile, if you’re a national government, apparently it’s a hard question to answer. First Lady Michelle Obama has asked us to get off our sofas in her Let’s Move campaign, and there have been other widely publicized health initiatives led by high-profile people—including myself. But as for an actual plan from any national government, we’re still waiting.

I believe that even the best governments can only think short term—as far as the next election or, at best, the one after that. Big problems that will take decades to solve are overwhelming, and the likelihood is that by the time things get really bad, the other guy will be in power. So I’m pretty sure a lot of them think that big solutions can wait. They can’t.

We’re at a particularly dangerous time in the United Kingdom. The latest figures from our National Health Service show that two-thirds of adult men are now overweight or obese. More worrying still are the figures for children. In the United Kingdom, 22 percent of our kids are overweight or obese when they start school at age four or five; by the time they leave primary school at 11, that figure rises to 33 percent. What chance do these kids have of turning their lives around when two to three generations of parents have lost the ability to feed themselves and their families properly, using the basic life skills that our great-grandparents took for granted?

If we look to the future, we see projections of expanding waistbands, worsening health, poorer quality of life for billions of people, completely overwhelmed health services, and less productive workforces. Is this the future we hoped for? Of course not. But it is the future we deserve unless we take urgent action.

It’s not too late to make a difference. There is a solution, and I think it’s actually a pretty simple one that every single person reading this can get involved in right now. As a campaigner and a food lover, but most importantly as a father (and hopefully one day a grandfather), I cannot stand by and watch this global health disaster unfold. That’s why I believe passionately in food education and in the power of people and communities all across the world to get together to make positive changes.

I believe that every kid in every school deserves to learn the basics about food: where it comes from, how to cook it, and how it affects their bodies. These life skills are as important as reading and writing, but they have been rapidly lost over the past few generations. Food education should be a legal requirement in every country. I’ve always loved the idea that some of the most delicious food and, honestly, the happiest families come from some of the poorest countries. What truly makes them rich is their knowledge, and that’s why it’s a crime that any country involved in this current health epidemic doesn’t have mandatory cooking lessons, decent food on offer for breakfast and lunch at school, and sufficient physical education. I know that with one e-mail, education ministries in many countries  could get small chunks of food awareness wrapped around every single subject that’s taught in school.

We’ve recently received some good news in the United Kingdom, where the government announced a new program of mandatory cooking lessons in school for kids aged 7 to 14. I’m waiting to see the detail, but in principle this is a huge and important step.

We know that cooking classes inspire kids. In 2011, the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine and Childhood Obesity Research Center evaluated some of the food-education programs we were running from our “Big Rig” mobile kitchen. Their study showed that the vast majority of kids grew more confident, were more likely to help make dinner at home (and so watched less TV while eating), and ate fewer meals in the car. Some 92 percent of the students felt that learning about nutrition was interesting, 82 percent agreed that they would try to cook the meals they had learned to cook at home, and 96 percent said they were happy they had taken the class.

Meanwhile, anecdotal evidence from the Ministry of Food centers that I launched in Australia and the United Kingdom suggest that the majority of adults who complete our healthy-cooking courses are saving money, losing weight, and gaining confidence—and often new friends—through the easily acquired knowledge of how to cook from scratch, as opposed to relying on prepared meals and takeout food.

A few generations ago, our great-grandparents knew how to stretch the family budget in tough economic times by buying cheaper cuts of meat, baking their own bread, and making the weekly groceries last. These days, too many families lack that knowledge. They end up spending more on supposedly cheaper, less nutritious prepared meals and bread full of additives. We need urgent action, and workplaces and communities can play a huge part. If your staffers can feed themselves properly and love cooking delicious, nutritious meals, then of course they’ll be healthier, more productive, and happier. Don’t we all want employees who are fitter for business and take fewer sick days?

The sustainable transformation of individuals, families, and communities doesn’t come from one action. Everything has to change, everyone must contribute, and everybody needs to be open-minded about change. It’s not easy, but that doesn’t mean individuals can’t lead the way. Of course, governments and other large organizations need to step up, but there’s no reason better food choices can’t start with individuals—and be fun.

I believe big change happens when lots of people get involved. That’s why I started Food Revolution Day last year. The idea is to set aside a single day each year for people worldwide to raise awareness about food education. It’s not specifically designed to send a message to governments—most don’t listen anyway—but to be the start of a grassroots movement. I believe Food Revolution Day can grow to become a catalyst for all those wonderful campaigners, chefs, teachers, doctors, parents, bloggers, journalists, and kids all over the world who want to eat better or who already know how to eat well and want to share their valuable knowledge.

Sharing is the key, whether you’re a grandparent or parent teaching your kids, a chef or food educator teaching in your community, or even a good home cook who wants to pass on your knowledge to your friends at work. Big change starts with little changes on a local and personal level. Before you know it, you’re part of something huge.

We launched Food Revolution Day on May 19, 2012. Amazingly, we sponsored 1,000 events, big and small, in 664 cities around the world, all hosted by passionate, brilliant people who cared. In San Francisco, a group of volunteers offered public tours of a local farmers market. Participants received valuable tips on how to buy and cook local produce. That night, the tour guides hosted an event at IDEO, a design and innovation consulting firm, that gathered a larger group of foodies and techies in the hope of forming lasting relationships. In Hong Kong, a group of local food bloggers and volunteers put together a successful cooking class, inspiring hundreds of local people. And in Milan, local Food Revolution ambassadors organized a huge range of events, from dinners to cooking classes.

One year later, we’ve made great connections and have begun to empower Food Revolution ambassadors across the world who care deeply about good food and want to share their knowledge with others. We now have ambassadors in 71 countries, and the number is growing. These are passionate folks who believe that food education can change lives for the better.

We’re doing Food Revolution Day all over again on May 17 this year, and it’s going to be bigger, better, and louder. We’re going to keep on doing it until we’re so loud that governments will have to listen. Please join us; you, too, can change the future.

Via Mckinsey on Society

Botiá, for sustainable packaging

576197_504485612946810_1298467285_nBeing brazilian, I feel proud to get to know that intelligent projects this one from Ybá – Design & Research are getting visibility and success. Ybá develops design projects guided by social-environmental responsibility. Following this responsible values, they come with an extremely clever solution to food packaging In this year’s Milan Design Week, they present Botiá.

English

Botiá is plywood developed with 100% national technology and raw materials. It is made from coconut fiber and fine manioc flour, it is biocompatible, easily degradable and low cost. Easy to mold, it can be used for several purposes. Its main features are firmness, lightness, hydrosolubility, low environmental impact and mechanical resistance. At disposal it can be returned to the factory, because its hydrosolubility allows reuse; it can also be used as a vase to be buried in the ground with no environmental harm. This material was employed in the making of food packaging. With nature’s nests concept in mind the Botiá – nests for food – was created. This line aims at reducing loss that occurs during transportation. With this plywood a hard packaging is created which protects its contents against external impacts. The use of loose fiber inside avoids damages to the food. – Ybá

 

Italiano

Botiá è un agglomerato prodotto con tecnologia e materia prima 100% brasiliana. Composto a base di fibra di cocco e fecola di tapioca, è biocompatibile, di degradazione rapida e a basso costo. Facilmente modellabile, può essere confezionata per diversi scopi. Ha come principali caratteristiche la rigidità, la leggerezza, la solubilità in acqua, il basso impatto ambientale e la resistenza meccanica. Al momento dello smaltimento l’agglomerato può essere restituito alla fabbrica, poiché la solubilità in acqua permette alla fibra di essere riutilizzata, o anche può essere utilizzato come vaso da piantare nel terreno senza causare alcun danno ambientale. Il materiale creato è stato utilizzato nella produzione d’imballaggi alimentari. Utilizzando il concetto dei “nidi naturali” è sorto Botià – nidi per il cibo. Questa linea mira a ridurre la perdita che si verifica durante il trasporto. Utilizzando tale agglomerato, si crea un imballaggio rigido capace di proteggere gli alimenti da impatti esterni. All’interno è applicata la fibra sciolta per evitare che gli alimenti subiscano danni all’interno della confezione. – Ybá

 

Português

Botiá é um aglomerado desenvolvido com tecnologia e matéria-prima 100% nacional. Feito à base de fibra de coco e polvilho, é biocompatível, de rápida degradação e baixo custo. Facilmente moldável, pode ser confeccionado para diversos propósitos. Tem como principais características a rigidez, a leveza, a hidrossolubilidade, o baixo impacto ambiental e a resistência mecânica. Na hora do descarte pode retornar à fábrica, pois sua hidrossolubilidade permite que a fibra seja reutilizada, ou ainda ser aproveitada como vaso para ser implantado na terra sem causar malefício algum. O material desenvolvido foi aplicado na confecção de embalagens para alimentos. Utilizando o conceito dos ninhos da natureza surgiu o Botiá – ninhos para alimentos. Esta linha visa reduzir a perda que ocorre durante o transporte. Utilizando o aglomerado cria-se uma embalagem rígida que protege de impactos externos. Por dentro aplica-se fibra solta para evitar que o alimento se machuque dentro da embalagem. – Ybá

Fresh and Organic conservation

4

 

Keeping our food fresh and more resistant to spoilage got potentially easier these days. People from Fenugreen came up with a very good alternative which is already a sales success, the Freshpaper. This magical biodegradable paper uses organic ingredients like spices and botanicals to keep foods fresh two to four times longer than usual. It comes a little bit smaller than square paper towels. The organic ingredients that makes it up  prevent spoiling by inhibiting bacterial and fungal growth also hindering enzymes that cause over-ripening in produce.

2

The use is simple, just place a sheet in your storage underneath the fruits and veggies. It will keep them fresh for longer.

Freshpaper emits a maple-like scent. It comes from one of the organic ingredients that the paper is made from. It’s fenugreek, used also in maple syrup flavoring. When the scent fades, it’s time for replacement. But you can always compost or recycle the used one.

Want to try it out? It’s also available online on Fenugreen online store.

3 5

Cortilia, organic Km Zero food – online –

Captura de Tela 2012-12-12 às 14.22.22

Better late than never, comes the platform for those who want to shop from local producers, but don’t have time. Cortilia is online, the first local farmer’s organic food market in sales and distribution network. And you can have it all at home. The network isn’t that large yet (available in Italy), but it’s a great initiative that can bring significative changes for both producers and consumers and also for those who aren’t a part of it, considering environmental and social gains.

Captura de Tela 2012-12-12 às 15.44.11

2011 TEDxManhattan Fellow: Artist Stefani Bardin

Artist Stefani Bardin, TEDxManhattan 2011 Fellow, shows us her latest project — using a “smartpill” to reveal how we digest differently processed foods.

Stefani produces videos and immersive, interactive installations that explores the influences of corporate culture and industrial food production. Her current project works with gastroenterologist Dr. Braden Kuo at Harvard University where they just completed the first ever clinical study to use the M2A™ and SmartPill devices that look at how the human body responds to processed versus whole foods. She is an Honorary Resident at Eyebeam Art +Technology Center in New York and teaches in the School of Art, Media and Technology at Parsons The New School for Design and in the Food Studies Program at The New School for Public Engagement.

Top 5 Chemicals to Avoid in Foods

If you want to feed your family healthier food, there are a few things to make sure aren’t in the food you serve. Here are Terri’s ‘Top 5 Chemicals to Avoid in Food’ so you can eat without worry!

1) Sodium Nitrate & Sodium Nitrite
These two similar ingredients are used in many processed meat products (think hot dogs, bacon, and lunch meats) because they act as food preservatives. However, both have been linked to different types of cancer. A better bet is to opt for meats labeled “nitrate-free” or “nitrite-free”.

2) Aspartame
This artificial sweetener is found in thousands of diet drinks and foods. While it’s been around for decades, it is one of the most controversial ingredients in our food chain. Some research suggests it is actually linked to many medical problems and even weight gain. Check with your doctor about making the switch to a new ingredient available known as Stevia. It’s a zero-calorie sweetener which comes from the Stevia plant.

3) Certain Food Dyes & Colorings
More and more parents are becoming increasingly concerned because of research which suggest food dyes are linked to hyperactivity in children. Think about all the artificially colored food items on the market such as juices, boxed foods, and bakery items. The safer choice is to avoid foods with numbered dyes on the ingredient list. Also, seek out organic foods which don’t contain synthetic food dyes and colorings.

4) BHA & BHT
Butylated Hydroxyanisole and Butylated Hydrozyttoluene are two similar additives which are common food preservatives. They work by preventing fats and oils from spoiling so you’ll see them used in chips, cereals, and even chewing gums. The concern is that they can cause cancer and can alter behavior. These additives aren’t banned from foods but they do have to be on the label. Also, remember that it’s usually junk food which contains them.

5) Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)
While PFOA is not added to our foods, many of our foods are contaminated with it. That’s because it’s used in food packaging and cookware. This chemical is linked to cancer and once it’s in your body, it can stay there for years. PFOA is used in many microwave popcorn bags and certain non-stick cookware. If you want to keep it out of the foods you eat, consider banning microwavable popcorn from your home and using non-toxic cookware such as cast iron or stainless steel.